Natalia Orlova vs Eleonora Alvisi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do their second serve performance stats compare? Orlova has been slightly stronger, winning 39.8% of her second serve points compared to Alvisi’s 35.64%.
• In recent return game stats, Alvisi displays an edge, winning 56.36% of opponent's second serve points versus Orlova's 52.5%.
• For first serve returns, Alvisi again holds an advantage, with a conversion of 38.4% compared to Orlova's 32.41%.
• Handling pressure under breakpoints, Orlova excels, saving 59.52% of breakpoints, surpassing Alvisi’s 45.57%.
• Considering overall match performance in the past year, Alvisi has won 54.05% of matches, slightly ahead of Orlova's 50% win rate.
• What about performance based on surface type? Alvisi is more proficient on Clay (52% win rate), while Orlova excels on indoor hard courts (50% win rate).
• In terms of playing level, Alvisi has a higher match count at Challengers/ITF > $10K, winning 48%, while Orlova's better success rate is seen in Futures/Satellites tournaments at 66.67%.
• Their opponent quality differs; Alvisi faced an average opponent rank of 320.05, whereas Orlova has encountered tougher competition with an average rank of 88.5.
• If the match enters a deciding set, Orlova has a perfect record of 100% wins, edging out Alvisi who has won 50% of deciding sets.
• Alvisi is more efficient in converting breakpoints at 41.79%, compared to Orlova's 36.36% success rate.

Editorial Prediction (July 14, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Alvisi and Orlova presents an interesting set of dynamics. Even though Orlova has shown better performance under pressure with higher breakpoint savings and stronger results in deciding sets, Alvisi counters with a more robust return game and slightly superior overall win percentage over the past year.

Alvisi's advantage in converting breakpoints and returning first serves could tip the balance early in the match. However, Orlova’s experience against higher-ranked opponents and her proficiency in indoor environments may play a significant role as the match progresses, especially if it reaches a deciding set where Orlova holds a distinct advantage.

Overall, the statistics provide a nuanced picture but suggest that while Alvisi brings certain strengths to the table, Orlova’s ability to handle high-pressure situations and compete against tougher opposition gives her a slight upper hand.

Based on these observations, Orlova is likely to emerge as the winner in the upcoming match.